Tonal Irreverence is, in short, a weekly summary of new (and new-ish) music releases, the print and e-buzz surrounding them, followed by our honest opinions…without the pretentious crap that often accompanies in unneccessarily long reviews. We’re not music journalists…we just love music. Period.

This week: The White Stripes, Art Brut, The Polyphonic Spree, Battles and Rihanna.

***

The White Stripes: Icky Thump [Warner Bros]

New Musical Express says: “[Icky Thump] was recorded over the course of a practically-gargantuan three weeks in Nashville’s Blackbird Studio, and addresses the problem most people had with its predecessor by dispensing with the sombre piano balladry and replacing it with snarling, hellbound guitars and a healthy dollop of gleeful perversity.”

New York Times says: “The White Stripes aren’t preservationists; they’re magical utilitarians. Authenticity, in and of itself, seems to bore them. They’re on a far more selfish mission, smelting down favorite bits of English-language culture for their own ends. Here these include Led Zeppelin, perfumed ’50s pop, Celtic folk song and the blues, which Mr. White plays with an electronic pitch shifter. (The White Stripes’ junk cart would have spinner rims.)”

Tiny Mix Tapes says: “People gawk at the monuments The White Stripes construct. Loitering teens vandalize them with aerosol spray and gum wads. Others take photographs in front of them, smiling and with thumbs-up. In the end, no wear-and-tear will tarnish these monuments. They are sturdy, virtually indestructible testaments. They are impressive, breathtaking at turns, and everlastingly present. They will go on to rival D.C., Greece, Rome, Egypt, and even Led Zeppelin.”

We say: “God, just shut up, already. This is rock and roll, motherfuckers.”

***

Art Brut: It’s a Bit Complicated [Downtown Recordings]

Rolling Stone says: “Whenever [Eddie Argos’] lyrics get fuzzy, there are enough well-modulated garage guitars or heartfelt choruses to keep you tuned in. It all adds up to something lovably unpretentious – and pretty unique.”

LA Times says: “Mostly [the album is] slapstick and social sketches, perfectly complemented by Art Brut’s music — a spiky, guitar-centric sound that’s bright and catchy (especially on the giddy chorus of “Direct Hit”) but never out to upstage the star.”

Prefix Mag says: “At its best, It’s a Bit Complicated reveals glimmers of its predecessor’s glory. At its worse, it sinks into blasé monotone.”

We say: “Three noisy guitars, one typically Brit-snotty lead singer, and a bunch of verse-chorus-verse, boy-meets-girl lyrics. Complicated? Dude, a five-year-old with autism could figure it out.”

***

The Polyphonic Spree: Fragile Army [TVT]

Pitchfork says: “The Fragile Army is an all-out orchestral and choral assault for optimism in a turbulent era, but only infrequently are the Spree’s songs as memorable as their numbers (and changing wardrobe).”

PopMatters says: “There’s something viscerally appealing in the naïveté of a musical philosophy that invariably champions the “bigger is better” aesthetic.”

AllMusicGuide says: “The Fragile Army is about the many places we are alike collectively, but find ourselves alone, and in that realization we may come together to form a new community.”

We say: “Peace, love and other ‘post-hippie’ bullshit – please, somebody get us a quaalude.”

***

Battles: Mirrored [Fusion]

Stylus Magazine says: “They manipulate—better than any band I can think of—the tension between the ecstatic, undisciplined glossolalia of the imagination and the voice that makes those raw materials stand to and march.”

Blender says: “Seemingly plotted on graph paper, the twisting riffs, inverted drum patterns and origami–intricate structures can seem overly flashy — like maybe these guys spent too long poring over musicians’ technical mags.”

Drowned in Sound says: “Each and every piece – pieces that truly do flow into one another quite magically – sinks into the listener’s synapses silkily, short-circuiting them through disbelief rather than a simmering intolerance.”

We say: “Crying in your Pabst ’cause all your less cool friends just discovered LCD Soundsystem? Well, dry your eyes and re-apply your glitter. This glam-metal-electro-whatever shit is nower than now, so you won’t have to worry about losing your edge for at least another month.”

***

Rihanna: Good Girl Gone Bad [Def Jam]

Fluxblog says: “Rihanna’s cold, aloof voice lend her songs an opportunistic, ruthless tone that comes closer to the aesthetic of last year’s Clipse album than your average R&B starlet. There’s a relentless self-serving nihilism that carries through all of Good Girl Gone Bad, including her weak attempts at sappy balladry.”

Billboard.com says: “Rihanna knows exactly what she wants and is in total control at all times, even when she’s throwing things and proclaiming ‘I’m a fight a man’ amid marching percussion and synthesizers set on ‘scare’ during ‘Breakin’ Dishes’.”

VIBE.com says: “This act of calculated sensuality is more than a simple hiking of hemlines – it’s adventurous reinvention.”

We say: “She may not be able to belt it like Béyoncé (or even, say, Ciara), but the girl can stretch the word ‘umbrella’ into sixty-four freaking syllables. Serious props.”


George Tuesday, 06.19.07 @ 4:59 pm

When did Josh Spear become a music touting site? I think you guys should stick to design, architecture, and art. Leave music alone.


Dave Allen Tuesday, 06.19.07 @ 9:22 pm

Wow, what happened here? I’m used to the incisive coverage of all things cool at joshspear.com but this all seems too childish. You can leave the snarky responses/reviews to Pitchfork…are you trying to dumb this site down? I really hope not, especially as I see those horrid Google ads alongside the comments column here. This is what I would term Brand Bruising…


Josh Spear Tuesday, 06.19.07 @ 10:35 pm

Funny. Thanks for the comment Dave, but believe it or not this is one of the best music posts we’ve ever had, and I applaud Heather for it! It’s witty, smart and an original idea!


Collin Tuesday, 06.19.07 @ 11:26 pm

Last time I checked, you didn’t need special permission to comment on things that make up a big part of your life. That is, after all, what this site is all about. The explanation at the top says it all…good post, Heather! Those Google ads are terrible, guys…quit trying to monetize your site. Nobody needs to make a living here.


Martyn Wednesday, 06.20.07 @ 5:54 am

My first reaction was ‘What a great post, where is the link for the Tonal Irreverence Website’ - and after much hunting I resolved my self to the same train of thought as Dave & George. Keep up the damn good work but don’t dilute your core values. As for Heather, I’d like to see this wit in full flow at http://www.Tonal Irreverence.com


Dave Allen Wednesday, 06.20.07 @ 10:51 am

Josh,

I’m happy to be wrong, let’s see how this rolls out. On second thoughts I think that maybe there’s room for something lighthearted like this but I’m still not convinced that it suppports the authority of the “voice” that this site has. Definitely a curve ball…..


Perc Thursday, 06.21.07 @ 10:51 am

Did any of you Miamians catch the battles live at studio a?
Face-meltingly epic.


Orange Monkey Thursday, 06.21.07 @ 2:47 pm

So this site is kind of turning into a blog of blogs so to speak?


Orange Monkey Thursday, 06.21.07 @ 2:48 pm

And no Perc, I don’t know where that is but the Battles will be graciously rocking out the Larimer Lounge here in Denver in a few.


Peabody Faust Friday, 06.22.07 @ 1:43 pm

I think you also have to think about how this is going to change the site. MTV is a great example of what this could turn into. By extending the site into a music critique blog, you run the risk of diluting the site. I think the site does a great job at recognizing trends in brands and the arts but when you start branching out into other things (music) you run the risk of abandoning the core of the site and the reason most viewers including myself come to the site. There are a great deal of music review sites out there and rehashing what they have on their site here doesn’t really carry any value. That’s just my opinion and feel free to keep doing music reviews, I just won’t read them.


Heather Snodgrass Friday, 06.22.07 @ 2:00 pm

Just because we’re starting to run regular columns doesn’t mean we’re shifting the core vision of the site, it’s just an attempt to introduce a little more editorial direction and basically see what works, see what doesn’t. As much as I’d love to have everyone read anything, I know personally I don’t on other sites, so I can’t really expect that to happen here. We’re really growing as a site, and change is something that is inevitable and necessary. Scary, I know, but this sometimes trial-and-error is really the only way to find out if something is going to work. What some people regard as dilution (ie: higher post counts, broader topics, changes in tonality and voice) we’re really seeing as diversifying our already wide scope of both coverage and contributors.

I’m really surprised (no positive or negative connotation there) at the reaction to this column, and also to the way people chose to respond — the majority of negativity ended up here; the positive, glowing feedback ended up in IMs, emails and phonecalls. That’s a study in itself, to see what actually gets people talking. Personally, I love this column, so I really appreciate the feedback, and we’ll see where this heads.


Josh Spear Friday, 06.22.07 @ 11:01 pm

Bravo on the response Heather. Lets see where this column takes us. Talk Shop Fridays is a staple here now!


Dave Allen Sunday, 06.24.07 @ 1:21 am

Heather,

Perhaps the negative comments ended up here because I don’t have your IM or mobile number and that could be addressed by having more transparency on the site. But surely you are pleased that folks like me are taking the time to comment, after all that’s the reason you have a commenting ability on the site. I have thought about my initial response to the column and realized that I was truly surprised that you lifted reviews of albums from other sites and merely dropped in a pithy comment at the bottom. I expect higher standards from Josh Spear.com and I think that should please all involved over there. On my own blog I find that when I stray too far from the core expectancy, [a bar I have set for myself,] I get the negative comments but hey, it’s all cool, interaction in media is powerful as you know.


Uninspired Sunday, 06.24.07 @ 10:34 pm

Though I’m sure you all at Josh Spear have unimpeachably cool taste in music, this is just not the place I would go to for music reviews. A new record label I should be paying attention to, sure. New technology for music listening, absolutely. But random thoughts on Rihanna and the White Stripes? It doesn’t appear to be what you’re good at or known for, and the rallying of the troops around this idea is a little baffling.


kevin Monday, 06.25.07 @ 5:13 pm

if you put both fingers on the trackpad and slide them down, you can actually scroll down past the post that you dont agree with and continue on to the next one. (if you dont own a mac, just push the down arrow a few times)




Sponsorship:

Joshspear.com brings a dedicated, young, and influential audience to brand advertisers.

Please contact us for more information.

Regular content continued below...





Global Warming Swimming Pool
Miles Davis Quintet: Workin’, Relaxin’, Steamin’
Queen: The Singles Collection
Monsieur T @ Hecklewod Gallery
Gift Guide: Travel
Our Holiday Gift and Giveaway Fesitivites
Radio BoomShot
The Cultivated Home
Own a Piece of Storefront
Public School x NY Hearts Me